VIEW THE MOBILE ALPHA VERSION OF THIS SITE

Bonesville: The Authoritative Independent Voice of East Carolina
Daily News & Features from East Carolina, Conference USA and Beyond

Mobile Alpha Roundup Daily Beat Recruiting The Seasons Multimedia Historical Data Pirate Time Machine SportByte™ Weather

 
 

 
Put your ad message in front of 1,000's and 1,000's of Pirate fans. Call 252.637.2944 for flexible options & rates.

 

 
 

SURVEYING THE LANDSCAPE
-----

Pirate Notebook No. 275
Tuesday, August 2, 2006

By Denny O'Brien

Parity hindering one of league's key pursuits

©2006 Bonesville.net

DALLAS — Ask each of Conference USA's 12 head coaches, and they all will agree: There is no clear-cut favorite to take home the league title in 2006.

In a conference entering its 11th season of college football, that has been the common theme since its inception. Parity, not a dynasty, has ruled C-USA on the gridiron, and it is a big reason the league's perception within the national media is weighted heavily toward mediocrity.

"When you look around the room at these tables, it is an unbelievable conference," East Carolina coach Skip Holtz said at the league's annual media gathering. "It's very competitive. Look at Central Florida and what they did a year ago.

"The difference between the top and the bottom is not very big. The difference is not very great at all. In this conference, there is no team that you look at and say 'that should be a definite win'."

And that's a problem.

For C-USA to gain more national attention, it desperately needs a couple of thoroughbreds to gallop away from a dead-heat pack. Until then it will remain under the curse that parity can place on a sport when it sticks around for extended periods of time.

It happened to a certain degree in the NFL. Former commissioner Pete Rozelle was so obsessed with leveling the playing field that the end result was a severe watering down of the competition. While that mission hasn't hurt the league's ratings, it has stripped away some of the glamour and reduced the product's quality as a whole.

Something similar occurred with ACC expansion two season ago. Now instead of boasting an annual national contender, balance has made it unlikely that the ACC will produce another football dynasty capable of battling regularly for No. 1.

That's not to say that the ACC isn't a better all-around league post-expansion — because it is. But improvement here is packaged with the reality that the league champion is more likely to finish the season with three losses than none.

That scenario should sound familiar to C-USA.

"In some years, you've got very competitive programs and a lot of parity," C-USA commissioner Britton Banowsky said. "In other years, you have a couple of dominant programs that do break out. That's just the natural cycle that we're in.

"There's a great upside to having a couple of lead programs, who have success in the non-conference and then get better and better in the conference. That would be a great story for our conference."

It surely would.

Imagine the exposure if Texas-El Paso breezed through a non-conference schedule that included New Mexico and Texas Tech, and then darn near ran the table against a tough C-USA gauntlet.

Or what if East Carolina opened the season by sinking Navy and later posted consecutive wins over the Virginias before clamping down on the meat of the league schedule?

The result in either case would be a new media darling for ESPN to embrace, along with added clout for a conference that has struggled to gain mention in the national polls.

Look no further than the Mountain West Conference for concrete evidence. Though there essentially is no difference in quality between the MWC and C-USA, the Mountain West is widely considered the better league thanks to a top-heavy setup that includes Texas Christian and Utah.

Likewise for the WAC. While it has only two quality programs worth mentioning — Fresno State and Boise State — that apparently is enough for it to be considered on par with C-USA, if not better.

What is most ironic in those scenarios is the fact that C-USA has been able to secure better television coverage and more postseason opportunities for its members. Credit that to the shrewd, yet underappreciated dealings of Banowsky.

With that in tow and the membership now basking in stability, it's tempting to think the next step for C-USA is to land an invitation to the BCS buffet. But first it needs a club that is pesky enough to nibble for crumbs on an annual basis.

That type of consistency from a pair of C-USA programs would greatly improve the league's national standing.

Send an e-mail message to Denny O'Brien.

Click here to dig into Denny O'Brien's Bonesville archives.

02/23/2007 02:03:14 AM

©2001-2002-2003-2004-2005-2006-2007-2008-2009-2010-2011-2012-2013 Bonesville.net. All rights reserved.
Articles, logos, graphics, photos, audio files, video files and other content originated on this site are the proprietary property of Bonesville.net.
None of the articles, logos, graphics, photos, audio files, video files or other content originated on this site may be reproduced without written permission.
This site is not affiliated with East Carolina University. View Bonesville.net's Privacy Policy. Advertising contact: 252-349-3280; Editorial contact: editor@bonesville.net; 252-444-1905.