Notes, Quotes and Slants
-----
College
Notebook No. 9
Tuesday, May 24, 2005
By Denny O'Brien |
|
After further review, replay
bad for C-USA
©2005 Bonesville.net
Forgive me if I don't share in Conference
USA's enthusiasm over its decision to explore an NFL model for instant
replay in league football games.
Where most probably view it as a sensible
solution to C-USA's glaring deficiencies in officiating, I see it as an
excuse to not improve the performance of the individuals responsible for
making the correct call.
But apparently league officials, along with
administrators and coaches from member schools, have resigned themselves to the same
answer our culture resorts to anytime man's imperfection is revealed.
Technology.
While I'll be the first to admit that my
quality of life improved dramatically the moment TiVo entered my home, the
idea of installing one in each of the league's football venues should be
pursued with extreme caution. The quality of the product on the field is at
risk, not to mention the bank accounts of the many league schools that are
in no financial shape to incur additional major expenses.
The cost of adopting the pro model won't be
cheap. The NFL spent millions of dollars on the hardware, software, and
labor to launch it's current model of instant replay, which is exactly why
the Big Ten chose a different route when it blazed the trail for college
football's latest cop out du jour.
And it's a trail on which many leagues have
hitched their wagons, including the ACC, Mountain West, SEC and Pac-10. What better reason for C-USA to not only adopt instant replay, but to
attempt to install the most sophisticated version of it in the college game?
Truthfully, replay in any format is about
the last thing administrators should pursue in C-Touchdown. With teams
regularly exceeding the 40-point threshold in league contests, the
conference would be better served focusing on experimental methods for
shortening games instead of measures that will likely lengthen them.
Despite any message the conference office
tries to sell — that it had minimal impact in the Big Ten or that only a
certain subset of calls can be reviewed — replay will lengthen games. Taking the red handkerchief from the coaches (the one aspect of the NFL
model not under consideration) could lengthen them even more if officials
take a liberal approach to reviewing questionable calls.
The NFL has greatly reduced the time impact
caused by instant replay by making it prudent for coaches to be cautious about challenging
plays. Thus, the number of plays reviewed has been reduced considerably
since the league adopted its most current structure.
Perhaps a bigger speed bump for C-USA to
overcome is the question of fairness and the assurance that replay can be
implemented equally league-wide. Given the age and design of some of the
venues, it is unlikely that each will provide all of the necessary camera
angles for the replay official to make the correct call.
What's more, the pressure on officials to
review plays will be greater at some stadiums than at others. Those venues
with state-of-the-art video screens often replay controversial plays,
providing coaches with many opportunities to pinpoint the err of an
official's ways.
There are some schools that have chosen
not to rerun such plays in an effort to keep hostility in the stands to a
minimum.
Who knows, maybe with enough research and
careful planning C-USA can iron out many of the already four-hour marathons,
and that it will be implemented equally conference-wide and with minimal
expense to member schools.
If that's the case, there is no denying the
potential benefit of such a system. Case in point: Perhaps East Carolina
finishes the 2003 season with an extra win after a South Florida "touchdown"
is overturned.
But even in the most perfect scenario,
there is an element of instant replay in college football with which I
disagree. It is that element of perfection and the demand for it at an
amateur level.
College football is a game that is played,
coached, and officiated by men. Each is integral to the game's success,
though no party is without flaw.
Players miss tackles, blow assignments, and
commit penalties and turnovers. Coaches sometimes fail to prepare their
team, make the necessary adjustments, or call the right play. And yes, game
officials occasionally find themselves out of position or outright miss a
call.
But the latter isn't the most frequent
occurrence, nor is it the most likely cause for any team's misfortune. It
is, however, a common scapegoat at which fans, players, and coaches vent
their frustrations, and it can come in handy as a convenient alibi for a
loss.
Introducing instant replay may require us
to occasionally shift the blame off those striped villains. I for one am
not ready for that.
Send an e-mail message to Denny O'Brien.
Click here to dig into Denny O'Brien's Bonesville
archives.
02/23/2007 02:00:00 AM |