AFCA backs non-BCS schools
By The
Associated Press
CyberEast of New Bern
"Service While You
Watch"
Need a quick
repair on your computer?
How about a
bigger hard drive or a DVD/RW-CD/RW?
Could a new
SoundBlaster™ Audigy card and speaker system
improve your experience listening to
Bonesville.net's Windows Media features?
Call CyberEast
of New Bern for an in-store appointment to get
your computer geared up to meet your needs while
you watch. |
417-C Broad St., New
Bern, NC |
252-637-4443 |
cybereast.com |
|
|
ORLANDO — College football
coaches want polls to carry more weight during the selection process for
the Bowl Championship Series and they want the the door opened wider for
schools outside the exclusive arrangement to earn their way into its
lucrative postseason pairings.
The American Football
Coaches Association, which represents the 117 coaches of Division I-A
teams, also wants better access to the high-paying BCS bowls for teams
that don't compete in power conferences.
"I'm not surprised by these recommendations," AFCA executive director
Grant Teaff said Wednesday. "The current system may not be perfect but
it is one that the Division I-A coaches continue to prefer.
"Coaches also believe that all Division I-A teams should have access to
a BCS-level game because it is important that student-athletes all have
the opportunity to compete at the highest level."
More than 70 coaches met at the end of the AFCA's convention Wednesday
to vote on proposals to the BCS administrators. It is unknown when the
conference commissioners who coordinate the BCS would take up the
requests.
The coaches took their
stand against the BCS's current computer-driven selection formula in
hopes of avoiding a repeat of the embarrassment created by a split
national championship.
When the final BCS standings were released in December to set up the
bowl matchups, the coaches were stunned to discover that Southern
California, their pick as No. 1 in the USA Today/ESPN poll, wasn't
playing in the title game at the Sugar Bowl, which instead matched LSU
and Oklahoma.
Surprise turned to dismay when it was discovered the 63 voting coaches
were contractually obligated to select Sugar Bowl winner LSU as their
top team in the final poll. However, three coaches broke ranks and
picked the Trojans No. 1.
USC won The Associated Press' poll of sportswriters and broadcasters.
"There needs to be tweaking," USC coach Pete Carroll said. "It didn't
come out right. It didn't work."
The BCS formula, designed to match the top two teams at the end of each
season, uses the two polls, seven computer rankings, strength of
schedule, losses and a bonus-point system for quality wins.
USC had been No. l in both polls heading into the postseason. But
Oklahoma topped the BCS rankings and the Trojans were nudged out of a
spot in the Sugar Bowl because the BCS computers awarded LSU the No. 2
spot based on a strength of schedule component.
Teaff said pitfalls were apparent when the coaches agreed six years ago
to the organization's role in the current system, but "nobody expected
that the pit would fall that hard."
Many proposals to change the BCS system were floated during the AFCA's
four-day convention.
One proposal called for any team that did not win its conference title
to be disqualified from the championship game.
"That would've eliminated Nebraska (from playing the Rose Bowl against
Miami in 2001) and Oregon would've gone, and that would've eliminated
Oklahoma this year," Washington State coach Bill Doba said.
Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer said that proposal penalizes
conferences without title games. He preferred that the No. 1 team in the
final poll of the regular season gain an automatic invitation to the BCS
title matchup.
All the coaches favored making only small adjustments to the current
system rather than junking it for a radical solution, such as a playoff.
"You want to be careful about too long of a playoff system; it's not
like the NFL." Kent State's Dean Pees said. "Everybody talks about
Division I-AA and II, but I don't remember seeing any other games on TV
other than the championship."
BONESVILLE ITEMS
SINCE JANUARY 1, 2004:
Henry Hinton:
Henry's Highlights -
01.08
—
Here's to wisdom for ECU and N.C. leaders
Bonesville:
AFCA backs non-BCS schools - 01.08
Bonesville:
Blazers escape town with win - 01.08
Nuggets:
Notes from ECU and beyond - 01.08
Pirate Radio 1250 Audio:
Live@5 Segment - 01.08
—
Troy Dreyfus, Jon Ellerbe & special guest William Shelton
Greg Vacek:
Daily Web Headlines Roundup - 01.08
Ron Cherubini:
Reflections
- 01.07
—
Note to conspiracy theorists: Count me in
Brian Bailey:
From the Anchor Desk -
01.07
—
UAB game has big implications
Nuggets:
Notes from ECU and beyond - 01.07
Letter to the Editor:
Jon Rogers, Alexandria, VA - 01.07
Cable 7 Audio:
Midweek Tip-Off - 01.07
—
Henry Hinton, Mike Steele, guests David Garrard, Bill
Herrion
Pirate Radio 1250 Audio:
Live@&5 Segment - 01.07
—
Troy Dreyfus, Jon Ellerbe, guest Bill Herrion
Pirate Radio 1250 Audio:
Sportsline Segment - 01.07
—
Patrick Johnson, guest Denny O'Brien
Denny O'Brien:
Pirate Notebook No. 167 -
01.06
—
Showdown with Blazers is Herrion's biggest
Bonesville:
BCS needs major surgery - 01.06
Bonesville:
Final AP & Coaches football polls - 01.06
Bonesville:
AP basketball poll - 01.06
Cable 7 Audio:
Brian Bailey Show - 01.06
—
Guest Greg Herenda
Pirate Radio 1250 Audio:
From The Locker Room - 01.06
—
Kevin Monroe & Sean Farmer
Pirate Radio 1250 Audio:
The Press Box - 01.06
—
Troy Dreyfus, Brian Bailey, Jody Jones & Jim Gentry
Al Myatt:
View from the East -
01.05
—
'Great night for purple and gold'
Bonesville:
USC shares glory - 01.05
Bonesville:
BCS looks to hoops for answers - 01.05
Letter to the Editor:
P. Jeff Martin, Akron, OH - 01.05
Bonesville:
Presidents say no, no, no to playoff - 01.04
Bonesville:
Rebs scuttle Pirates - 01.04
Bonesville:
Change inevitable for failed BCS equation - 01.03
Denny O'Brien:
Pirate Notebook No. 166 -
01.02
—
Pirates getting fortified for league gauntlet
Bonesville:
Juco dragnet snares another tight end - 01.01 |
|
Also unanimously rejected
was a proposal that would include one additional championship game — the
so-called "bowl system plus one" model.
Increased access to the
BCS bowls has been a long-awaited goal for the schools that don't play
in the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-10 and SEC.
Since the BCS was
established in 1998, smaller schools have complained they are shut out
of the most lucrative bowl games, even if a team excels.
Options include
designating a fifth BCS bowl or loosening requirements for the four
existing bowls, AFCA spokesman Todd Bell said.
The timetable for
consideration by BCS administrators is unknown.
Other issues discussed by the coaches included:
— Leaving the overtime system in place without any changes for next
season.
— Requesting legislation for five years of eligibility.
— Prohibiting midterm enrollees from participating in bowl practices.
Those items will be brought to the NCAA Division I-A Football Issues
Committee for discussion at its meeting this weekend in Nashville.
02/23/2007 10:40 AM
Copyright 2004 The
Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
|